AIandML

An in-depth article exploring the critical differences between real scientific research and automated electronic searches in the digital age. It discusses the strengths and limitations of AI, machine learning, and popular search engines like Google and ChatGPT. The post emphasizes that while technology enhances access and efficiency, it cannot replace human judgment, critical thinking, and scholarly rigor. It highlights challenges such as paywalled articles, undigitized primary sources, and the risk of overreliance on AI. The article encourages researchers, especially young scholars, to use AI tools wisely and maintain ethical standards and curiosity in scientific inquiry.

Real Scientific Research vs. Electronic Search: Why Human Inquiry Still Leads in the Age of Algorithms (Codes and Data)

In an age dominated by AI and digital search tools, this article highlights why true scientific research still relies on human insight. It explores the benefits and limits of technologies like ChatGPT and Google, stresses the importance of accessing peer-reviewed and primary sources, and urges scholars to combine AI with critical thinking for rigorous, ethical inquiry.

Tusi Publications

Jul 95 min read